The full UK roulette app comparison: all 10 apps side by side

How to read this UK roulette app comparison

This page is the full roulette app comparison behind the homepage ranking. All 10 UK roulette apps in the dataset appear in one table, so you can compare UK roulette apps on the same criteria at the same reference date rather than reading ten separate reviews. Every row is an operator that holds a UK Gambling Commission licence; every column is a value collected or derived from a public source on 3 June 2026, the reference date printed above the table.

The Roulette Score is the primary ranking and runs from 0 to 100. It is built from three dimensions. Platform availability is worth 15 points: 10 for a native iOS app, 3 for an Android app and 2 for a progressive web app. iOS app quality is worth 35 points: up to 25 for the App Store rating and up to 10 for update recency. Live roulette provider depth is worth 50 points: 22 for Evolution, 18 for Playtech and 10 for Pragmatic Play, awarded only where the studio was confirmed in the operator's live lobby at the reference date.

The Trust Score is shown as a separate signal and is never blended into the Roulette Score. UK Gambling Commission licence status carries 50 points: a licence verified on the public register scores 50, an operating entity that could not be confirmed scores 25 and a pending status scores 0. Trustpilot carries 30 points on a banded scale, from 30 points at 3.5 stars or above down to 6 points for anything between 1.0 and 2.0. Responsible gambling tooling carries the remaining 20 points. In the current dataset every operator scores 0 on that dimension, because the points are only awarded after account-level verification, which is outside the scope of this release; the limitation is disclosed on the methodology page and in each operator's score breakdown.

Both scores carry a band label: Excellent from 80, Strong from 65, Good from 50 and Limited from 35. Bands make the full comparison readable at a glance, but the sort uses the underlying number, so two Excellent apps still appear in score order. Click any column heading to re-sort. The default order is Roulette Score descending, with Trust Score and then operator name as tie-breakers. The provider filter narrows the table to apps that carry a given live roulette studio, and the band filter shows one score band at a time, which is the quickest way to compare UK roulette apps that clear a minimum bar.

The Updated column shows the date of the last iOS release recorded through the Apple iTunes Search API on the reference date. The recency component of the Roulette Score awards 10 points for a release within 30 days of that date, 6 points within 90 days, 3 points within 180 days and 0 beyond. Because the reference date is fixed, every score in this roulette app comparison stays reproducible: nothing is recalculated as the calendar moves on, and the next dataset release will carry its own printed date.

A warning marker next to a score means at least one input was inferred rather than verified, most often a progressive web app whose availability could not be confirmed directly, or a live provider reported by conflicting sources. Provisional scores are deliberately left unrounded. The profile page for each operator states the exact reason for the flag and the size of the possible adjustment, so the uncertainty is visible rather than hidden inside a tidy number.

This full comparison is not an affiliate leaderboard. Operators cannot buy a position, the methodology is published in full, and every input can be checked against its source: the App Store rating, the UK Gambling Commission licence account and the Trustpilot score are quoted on each operator page with the date they were read. Where the data is thin, the table says so instead of filling the gap with an estimate. Read the roulette app comparison as evidence to weigh, not as a recommendation to follow.